Human genome editing technologies in the center of current transhumanistic discourse on human enhancement

Frank Mali

doi:10.62229/

Autori

Frank Mali University of Ljubljana Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62229/

Cuvinte cheie:

human enhancement, genome editing technology, bioethics, moral entrepreneurship, CRISPR-Cas 9 technology, He Jiankui affair

Rezumat

The article deals with certain challenges connected with the progress of human enhancement technologies, where genome editing technologies form part of them. Today, the idea of human enhancement is the subject of considerable debate among various streams of transhumanist thinkers. The author rejects pessimistic and dystopian views on human enhancement technologies that see these technologies as one of the main risks for modern civilization, and instead defends the opposite view. It is claimed that although such technologies continue to be relatively poorly defined, they do and will belong to the 'good side' of current (future) technological progress. Namely, in the context of pragmatic and moderate transhumanism, human enhancement is primarily viewed as a way of improving the quality of human and social life. The article mainly refers to human genetic enhancement, noting that the invention of CRISPR/Cas9 technology about 10 years ago paved the way for a revolution in gene research and gene therapy. Before the emergence of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, bioethical discussions had mostly concentrated on classical bioethical dilemmas (autonomy, privacy, etc.). Yet, the situation has changed radically in the last 3 years when the first practical misuses of CRISPR-Cas 9 technology (the He Jiankui affair) in germline genome editing were reported. Although the author agrees with views calling for more scientific and broader social control of germline genome editing, strong support is given for the claims made by moderate and pragmatic transhumanists that modern democratic societies must ensure that objective and unbiased assessments of the benefits/risks of all types of human enhancement technologies are retained.

Referințe

Almeida, Mara and Ranische, Robert (2022). "Beyond safety: mapping the ethical debate on heritable genome editing interventions." Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9 (139): 1-14.

Anderson, French (1985). "Human Gene Therapy: Scientific and Ethical Considerations." The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 10 (3): 275–291.

Baumann, Martina (2016). "CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing new and old ethical issues arising from a revolutionary technology." Nanoethics, 10(2): 139-159.

Bostrom, Nick (2005). "Transhumanist Values". Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement): 3-14.

Calvert, Jane (2010). "Synthetic biology: constructing nature?". In Nature after the genome, edit by Sarah Parry and John Dupre, 95–113. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

De Grey, Aubrey and Rea, Michael (2008). Ending Aging. The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs That Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. New York: St's Martin Griffin.

Drew, Endy (2005). "Foundations for Engineering Biology". Nature, 438 (7067): 449–453.

Drew, Endy (2014). "Introduction. How would you design nature?". In Synthetic aesthetics. Investigating synthetic biology's designs on nature, edit by Endy D., Ginsberg A., Calvert J., Schyfter P., Elfick A., 7–22. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Fuller, Steve (2012). Preparing for Life in Humanity 2.0. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fuller, Steve and Lipinska, Veronika (2014). The Proactionary Imperative. A Foundation for Transhumanism. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Greely, Henry (2019). "CRISPR'd babies: human germline genome editing in the 'He Jiankui affair'." Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6 (1): 111–183.

Hall, Melinda (2019). "Second Thoughts on Enhancement and Disability." In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability, edit by Adam Cureton and David T. Wasserman, 633–650. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hollingworth, Rogers (2006). Fostering Scientific Excellence. Organizations, Institutions, and Major Discoveries in Biomedical Science. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huxley, Julien (1968). "Transhumanism". Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 8 (1): 73-76.

Jiankui, He (2018). About Lulu and Nana: Twin girls born healthy after gene surgery as singlecell embryos. Available at *<*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th0vnOmFltc&t=81s>

Keeler, Allison and Mallah Mk and Flotte Tr (2017). "Gene Therapy: Progress and Future Directions." Clinical and Translational Science, 10(4): 242–248.

Kurzweil, Ray (2005). Singularity is Near. When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Penguin Group.

Martin Paul, Michael Morrison, Ilke Turkmendag, Brigitte Nerlich, Aisling McMahon, Stevienna de Saille and Andrew Bartlett (2020). "Genome editing: the dynamics of continuity, convergence, and change in the engineering of life." New Genetics and Society, 39 (2): 219-242.

Meyer, Morgan (2022). "Taking responsibility, making irresponsibility. Controversies in human gene editing". Social Studies of Science, 52 (1): 127-143.

Mukherjee, Siddhartha (2016). The Gene. The Intimate History. New York: Scribner.

Nuffieled Council on Bioethics (2018). Annual Report 2018. Available at https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/NCOB-Annual-Report-2018.pdf

Newton, Lee (Ed.) (2019). "The Brave New World of Transhumanism". In Transhumanism Handbook, edit by Newton Lee, 3-49. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Parrish, Elizabeth (2019). "Extending Healthy Human Lifespan Using Gene Therapy." In Transhumanism Handbook, edit by Newton Lee, 423 – 433. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Pontin, Jason (2018). "The Genetics (and Ethics) of Making Humans Fit for Mars". Wired, July 8.

Roco, Mihail and Bainbridge, William (2002). Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Available at <https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/ microsites/ostp/bioecon-%28%23%20023SUPP%29%20NSF-NBIC.pdf>

Sand, Martin, Annelien, Bredenoord and Karin Jongsma (2019). "After the fact—the case of CRISPR babies". European Journal of Human Genetics, 27 (June):1621–1624.

Savulescu, Julian, Ruud ter Meulen, Guy Kahane (2011). Enhancing Human Capacities. Malden and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Sorgner, Stefan L. (2022). Philosophy of Posthuman Art. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.

Sorgner, Stefan L. (2021). We have always been cyborgs. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

Sorgner, Stefan L. (2016). Transhumanism. Die gefaerlichste Idee der Welt!?. Freiburg in Breisgau: Verlag Herder GmbH.

Splicing Life (1982). A Report on the Social and Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering with Human Beings. Washington, President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/548744

Stambler, Ilia (2019). "What Do We Need to Know to Treat Degenerative Aging as a Medical Condition to Extend Healthy Lifespan?" In Transhumanism Handbook, edit by Newton Lee, 381-397. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Tyagia Swati. Kumarb R., Dasc A., So Youn W., and Pratyoosh S. (2020). "CRISP R-Cas9 system: A genome-editing tool with endless possibilities." Journal of Biotechnology, 319 (10. August): 36-53.

Turkmendag, Ilke an Martin, Paul (2021). "Thinking the unthinkable: how did human germline genome editing become ethically acceptable?" New Genetics and Society, 40 (4): 384–405.

Venner, Eric, Yi Victoria, David Murdock, Ge Zhang, Lan Zhang and Hana Zouk (2021). "Neptune: an environment for the delivery of genomic medicine". Genetics in Medicine, 23(10): 1838-1846.