Knowledge of official ethical standards and tolerance towards corruption: An exploratory study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54885/AUB-SP-FGPM5999Keywords:
corruption, democratic norms, knowledge, tolerance, ethicsAbstract
Corruption is often defined as a deviant conduct from established legal and formal norms and expected ways of behaving in the exercise of official duties and the discharge of official responsibilities. Readiness to tolerate corruption will hinge primarily upon the evaluator’s understanding of what those ethical standards are. This means that citizens’ willingness to accept corruption as something “normal” to the functioning of democracy or “beneficial” to economic development is likely to be affected by how knowledgeable they are about the ethical standards of governing public office. Such knowledge can be instilled by academic and experiential learning. So, we question to what extent citizens’ knowledge of official ethical standards affect their tolerance towards corruption? Based on new individual level data collected from six focus groups conducted in Portugal, we show a possible negative association between the appropriate knowledge of official ethical standards and tolerance towards corruption. The results are exploratory, but sufficiently interesting to test our hypothesis with a larger sample.References
ADLER, Emily Stier & Roger CLARK. 2008.How It's Done: An Invitation to Social Research, 3 rd ed. Belmont: Thomson/Wadsworth.
ALLEGRETTI, Christine & Norris FREDERICK. 1995. A model for thinking critically about ethical issues.Teaching of Psychology22(1): 46-48.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top220114.
ANAND, Vikas, Blake E. ASHFORTH & Joshi MAKENDRA. 2005. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations.The Academy of Management Executive19(4): 9-23.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4166202.
ALLEN, Nicholas & Sarah BIRCH. 2012. On either side of a moat? Elite and mass attitudes towards right and wrong.European Journal of Political Research51(1): 89-116.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01992.x.
ARLOW, Peter & Thomas A. ULRICH. 1980. Business ethics, social responsibility, and business students: An empirical comparison of Clark's study.Akron Business and Economic Review11(3): 17-22.
CHANG, Eric & Nicholas KERR. 2017. An Insider–Outsider Theory of Popular Tolerance for Corrupt Politicians.Governance30(1): 67–84.https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12193.
CHEN, Yuh-Jia & Thomas L. TANG. 2006. Attitude toward and propensity to engage in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across major among university students.Journal of Business Ethics69(1): 77-93.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9069-6.
CLEMENTE, Felippe & Viviani Silva LIRIO. 2017. Evidências internacionais de sonegação fiscal: uma análise a partir do modelo de Graetz, Reinganun e Wilde.Estudos Econômicosonline]: 47(3): 487-507.[https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614732fcv.
CLEMINSON, Andrew & Simon BRADFORD. 1996. Professional education: The relationship between “academic” and experiential learning.Journal of Vocational Education & Training48(3): 249-259.https://doi.org/10.1080/1363682960480303.
DE SOUSA, Luís. 2008. “I Don't Bribe, I Just Pull Strings:” Assessing the fluidity of social representations of corruption in Portuguese society.Perspectives on European Politics and Society9(1): 8–23.https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850701825402.
DE SOUSA, Luís. 2019.Corrupção e Ética em Democracia: O Caso de Portugal, 2006. Arquivo Português de Informação Social, Lisboa. APIS0038,http://hdl.handle.net/10400.20/2051.
DE SOUSA, Luís & João TRIÃES, eds. 2008. A corrupção e os portugueses: Atitudes, práticas e valores.Lisbon: RCP Edições.
DE SOUSA, Luís & João TRIÃES. 2009. Capital social e corrupção. InÉtica, Estado e Economia: Atitudes e práticas dos europeus,ed. Luís De Sousa, pp. 93-125. Lisbon: ICS Publicações.
DE SOUSA, Luís & Marcelo MORICONI. 2013. Why voters do not throw the rascals out? A conceptual framework for analysing electoral punishment of corruption.Crime, Law and Social Change60(5): 471-502.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9483-5.
DE SOUSA, Luís, Isabel R. PINTO, Felippe CLEMENTE & Gustavo GOUVÊA MACIEL. 2021. Using a three-stage focus group design to develop questionnaire items for a mass survey on corruption and austerity: A roadmap.Qualitative Research Journal21(3): 304-319.https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-09-2020-0110.
DOIG, Alan & Stephanie McIVOR. 1999. Corruption and Its Control in the Developmental Context: An Analysis and Selective Review of the Literature.Third World Quarterly20(3): 657-676.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3993327.
GATTI, Roberta, Stefano PATERNOSTRO & Jamele RIGOLINI. 2003. Individual attitudes toward corruption: Do social effects matter.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3122.
GOODMAN, Charles S & Merle C. CRAWFORD. 1974. Young executives: A source of new ethics?Personnel Journal53(March): 180-187.
GOUVÊA MACIEL, Gustavo. 2021. What we (don't) know so far about tolerance towards corruption in European democracies: measurement approaches, determinants, and types.Social Indicators Research157(1)1131-1153.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02690-y.
GOUVÊA MACIEL, Gustavo & Luís DE SOUSA. 2021. Legal corruption and dissatisfaction with democracy in the European Union.Social Indicators Research140(2): 653-674.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1779-x.
HAKHVERDIAN, Armen & Quinton MAYNE. 2012. Institutional trust, education, and corruption. A micro-macro interactive approach.Journal of Politics74(3): 739-750.https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000412.
HAWKINS, Delbert I & A. Benton COCANOUGHER. 1972. Student evaluations of the ethics of marketing practices: The role of marketing education.Journal of Marketing36(2): 61-64.https://doi.org/10.2307/1250980.
HOLLON, Charles J & Thomas A. ULRICH. 1979. Personal business ethics: Managers vs managers-to-be.Southern Business Review5(1): 17-22.
HUNADY, Jan. 2017. Individual and institutional determinants of corruption in the EU countries: the problem of its tolerance.Economia Politica34(1): 139-157.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-017-0056-4.
JOHNSTON, Michael. 1986. Right and Wrong in American Politics: Popular Conceptions of Corruption.Polity18(3): 367-391.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234766.
LANDRY, Raymond, Glen D. MOYES & Angelica C. CORTES. 2004. Ethical perceptions among Hispanic students: Differences by major and gender.Journal of Education for Business Ethics80(2): 102-108.https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.80.2.102-108.
LAVENA, Cecília. 2013. What Determines Permissiveness Toward Corruption?Public Integrity15(4): 345-366.https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922150402.
LAU, Cubie L. L. 2010. A step forward: Ethics education matters!Journal of Business Ethics92(4): 565-584.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0173-2.
MAGALHÃES, Pedro, Luís DE SOUSA, Isabel PINTO, Gustavo GOUVÊA MACIEL, Felippe CLEMENTE. 2020.Base de dados dos grupos focais do projecto EPOCA, 2020. Arquivo Português de Informação Social, Lisboa. APIS0065,http://hdl.handle.net/10400.20/2084.
MALMBERG, Fredrik. 2019.The Rotting Fish? Institutional Trust, Dysfunctional Contexts, and Corruption Tolerance: A multilevel study of the justification of low-level corruption in a global perspective[PhD Thesis]. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi University.http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-765-945-1.
MANCUSO, Maureen, Michael ATKINSON, Andre BLAIS, Ian GREENE & Neil NEVITTE. 1998.A Question of Ethics: Canadians Speak Out. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
MÉNY, Yves. 1997. “Fin de siècle” corruption: Change, crisis and shifting values.International Social Science Journal48(3): 309-320.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00034.
MOCAN, Naci. 2008. What determines corruption? International evidence from microdata.Economic Inquiry46(4): 493-510.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00107.x.
MORENO, Alejandro. 2002. Corruption and Democracy: A Cultural Assessment.Comparative Sociology1(3): 495-507.https://doi.org/10.1163/156913302100418556.
MORGAN, David. 1997.Focus group as qualitative research, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
NEWSTROM, John W & W. A. RUCH. 1975. The Ethics of management and the management of ethics.MSU Business Topic23(Winter): 29-37.
OECD [Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development]. 1997.Best Practice Guidelines for Contracting Out Government Services(PUMA Policy Brief). Paris: OECD.
POP, Laura. 2012. Acceptance of corrupt acts: A comparative study of values regarding corruption in Europe.Journal of Social Research and Policy3(1): 27-42.
POZSGAI-ALVAREZ, Joseph. 2015. Low-level corruption tolerance: An “action-based” approach for Peru and Latin America.Journal of Politics in Latin America7(2): 99-129.https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1500700204.
PIZZORNO, Alessandro. 1992. La corruzione nel sistema politico. Introduction for Donatella della Porta,Lo scambio occulto: Casi di corruzione politica in Italia, 13-74. Bologna: Il Mulino.
PURCELL, Theodore V. 1977. Do courses in business ethics pay off?California Management Review19(4): 50-58.https://doi.org/10.2307/41164723.
ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan. 1999.Corruption: A study in political economy. New York: Academic Press.
SELF, Donnie J. & Margie OLIVAREZ. 1996. Retention of moral reasoning skills over the four years of medical education.Teaching and Learning in Medicine8(4): 195-199.https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339609539797.
SHUPTRINE, F. Kelly. 1979. Evaluating the ethics of marketing practices: Student perceptions. InEducators Conferences Proceedings, eds. Neil Beckwith, Michael M. Houston, Scott Ward, Robert Mittelstaedt & Kent B. Monroe, 124-127. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
STEVENS, G. E. 1984. Business ethics and social responsibility: The responses of present and future managers.Akron Business and Economic Review. 15: 6-11.
TRUMAN, David B. 1971.The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
UNCAC [United Nations Conventions Against Corruption]. 2004.United Nations Conventions Against Corruption. New York: United Nations, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.https://www.unodc.org/documents/brussels/UNConventionAgainstCorruption.pdf.
VILLORIA, Manuel, Gregg G. Van RYZIN & Cecila F. LAVENA. 2013. Social and political consequences of administrative corruption: A study of public perceptions in Spain.Public Administration Review73(1): 85-94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02613.x.
ZAKARIA, Patty, 2016. The influence of socioeconomic trends and experiences on individual perception of corruption: The case of Croatia.Public Integrity18(4): 419-440.https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1172929
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Analele Universității din București. Științe politice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
