FREGE ON INFORMATIVE IDENTITIES BETWEEN STATEMENTS

NORA GRIGORE

doi:10.62229/rrfaxvi-1/1

Autori

NORA GRIGORE University of Bucharest Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62229/rrfaxvi-1/1

Cuvinte cheie:

paradox of analysis, Frege’s puzzle, informative identities, Frege-Husserl correspondence

Rezumat

The Frege-Husserl correspondence can be fruitfully explored so as to provide new insight into the paradox of analysis. Why are some identifies informative and others not? And how could we ascertain the issue if under scrutiny are mathematical identities, necessarily true if true at all? This text articulates the distinction between logical and semantic criteria in order to clarify a possible Fregean solution to the paradox of analysis, starting from regarding analysis as generating particular cases of Frege puzzles.

Biografie autor

NORA GRIGORE, University of Bucharest

Nora Grigore is a researcher at the “Constantin Rădulescu-Motru” Institute of Philosophy and Psychology of the Romanian Academy, a Humanities instructor at “Mihai Viteazul” National College and associate faculty of the Department for Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Bucharest