A Theoretical Overview of the Creation of the Inimical Other in Contemporary Populist Discourse

Authors

  • RADU GEORGE DUMITRESCU University of Bucharest Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62229/

Keywords:

Populism, political theory, comparative politics, political discourse, political identity

Abstract

Populist discourse is notoriously hard to pinpoint, molding itself on a great variety of national circumstances. In every instance, however, one element always remains present, namely the opposition between the people and the inimical Other. The Other has been a constant for populists from Juan Peron to Donald Trump. The present article argues that despite the importance placed upon “the people” within scholarship on populism, the inimical Other is presently the key concept through which populism is defined. Placing a negative term as central to the populist phenomenon, the article will then show the importance of the inimical Other in historical terms. Unlike those who abide by the discursive rules of liberal democracy, which pacify friend-enemy distinctions, populists embrace a foundational Manichean opposition that is reminiscent of defunct ideologies such as fascism, Nazism, and communism.

References

Simon Usherwood, “Shooting the Fox? UKIP’s Populism in the Post-Brexit Era,” West European Politics 42, no. 6 (April 2019): 2.

Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell, eds. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 3.

Kirk A. Hawkins and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, “The Ideational Approach to Populism,” Latin American Research Review 52, no. 4 (October 2017): 513–528.

Elinor Ochs, “Indexing Gender,” in Rethinking Context, eds. Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 335-358.

Michael Silverstein, Talking Politics: The Substance of Style from Abe to “W.” (Chicago: Paradigm Press, 2003).

Denitza Kamenova and Etienne Pingaud, “Anti-migration and Islamophobia: Web Populism and Targeting the ‘Easiest Other,”’ in Populism and the Web: Communicative Practices of parties and Movements in Europe, eds. Mojca Pajnik and Brigit Sauer (New York, London: Routledge, 2018), 114.

Carlos de la Torre, “Populism in Latin America,” in The Oxford Handbook of Populism, eds. Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 310-40.

Paul Taggart, “Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics,” in Democracies and the Populist Challenge, eds. Yves Meny and Yves Surel (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 62-80.

Cas Mudde, Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 23.

Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, eds., Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective to Democracy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).

Benjamin Moffitt and Simon Torney, “Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style,” Political Studies 62, no. 2 (2014): 381.

Benjamin Moffitt, The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016), 29.

Anton Pelinka, “Right-wing Populism: Concept and Typology,” in Right-wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, eds. Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, Brigitte Mral (London: Bloomsbury, 2013), 3–22.

Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell, “Introduction: The Sceptre and the Spectre,” in Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, eds. Daniele Albertazzi, and Duncan McDonnell (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 3. Albertazzi and McDonnell, “Introduction,” 6.

Michael Bossetta, “Fighting Fire with Fire: Mainstream Adoption of the Populist Political Style in the 2014 Europe Debates between Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, no. 4 (June 2017): 7.

Ruth Wodak, The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean (University of Lancaster: Sage, 2015), 25.

Matthijs Rooduijn, “The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator,” Government and Opposition 49, no. 4 (September 2013): 573-599.

Aurelien Mondon and Aaron Winter, Reactionary Democracy: How Racism and the Populist Far Right Became Mainstream (London and New York: Verso Books, 2020), 46.

Guy Peters and Jon Pierre, “A Typology of Populism: Understanding the Different Forms of Populism and Their Implications,” Democratization 27, no. 6 (May 2020): 928-946.

Nico Carpentier, The Discursive-material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation (New York: Peter Lang, 2017).

Carsten Reinemann, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Jesper Stromback, and Claes H. de Vreese, “Populist Political Communication: Toward a Model of Its Causes, Forms, and Effects,” in Populist Political Communication in Europe, eds. Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback and Claes H. de Vreese (London: Routledge, 2017), 12–25.

Daniele Caramani and Luca Manucci, “National Past and Populism: The Reelaboration of Fascism and Its Impact on Right-wing Populism in Western Europe,” West European Politics 42, no. 6 (May 2019): 1159-1187.

Alan Knight, “Populism and Neo-populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico,” Journal of Latin American Studies 30, no. 2 (May 1998): 223–48.

Michael Kazin, The Populist Persuasion: An American History (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).

Vanessa Williamson, Theda Skocpol and John Coggie, “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism,” Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 1 (March 2011): 32.

Williamson, Skocpol and Coggie, “The Tea Party,” 33.

Gianfranco Pasquino, “Populism and Democracy,” in Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, eds. Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 28.

Kurt Weyland, “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics,” Comparative Politics 34, no. 1 (October 2001): 1–22;

Margaret Canovan, “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy,” Political Studies 47, no. 1 (March 1999): 2–16; Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason (London, New York: Verso, 2005);

Matthijs Rooduijn, A Populist Zeitgeist? The Impact of Populism on Parties, Media and the Public in Western Europe (Amsterdam: Almanakker Oosterhout, 2013), 5.

Alfio Mastropaolo, “Politics Against Democracy: Party Withdrawal and Populist Breakthrough,” in Twenty-First Century Populism, eds. Albertazzi and McDonnell, 34.

Pierre Rosanvallon, La contre-démocratie: La politique à l’âge de la defiance (Paris: Seuil, 2006).

Nadia Urbinati, Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy (London: Harvard University Press, 2019), 52.

Emily Stuart, “Watch John Mccain Defend Barack Obama Against a Racist Voter In 2008,” Vox, September 1, 2018.

Theodore Schleifer, “Donald Trump Doesn't Challenge Anti-Muslim Questioner,” CNN, September 15, 2015.

Robert F. Murphy, “Intergroup Hostility and Social Cohesion,” American Anthropologist (1957): 1018-1035.

Thomas Diez, “Europe’s Others and the Return of Geopolitics,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17, no. 2 (July 2004): 321.

Vladimir Dobrenko, “Constructing the Enemy: Stalin’s Political Imagination and the Great Terror,” Russian Journal of Communication 3, no. 1-2 (December 2010), 76.

Sam Keen, Faces of the Enemy: Reflections of the Hostile Imagination (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986). As cited in Dobrenko, “Constructing the Enemy,” 80.

Harold Laswell, “The Strategy of Soviet Propaganda,” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 24, no. 2, (January 1951): 66-78.

Marla Stone, “Italian Fascism’s Soviet Enemy and the Propaganda of Hate, 1941-1943,” Journal of Hate Studies 10, no. 1 (January 2012): 74.

Jeffrey Herf, The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust (Harvard University Press, 2006), 6.

Alexander G. Hardy, Hitler’s Secret Weapon: The “Managed” Press and Propaganda Machine of Nazi Germany (New York: Vantage, 1967), 37-41.

Michael Dutton, “Friend and Enemy,” in Afterlives of Chinese Communism: Political Concepts from Mato to Xi, eds. Christian Sorace, Ivan Franceschini and Nicholas Loubere (ANU Press, 2019).

Soren Urbansky, “The Unfathomable Foe. Constructing the Enemy in the Sino-Soviet Borderlands, ca. 1969-1982,” Journal of Modern European History 10, no. 2 (May 2012): 257. Urbansky, “Unfathomable,” 258.

Chuanxing Wang, “The ‘Enemy’ Complex of Populism in American Ethnic Politics and Its Implications to Trump’s Foreign Policy,” Chinese Political Science Review 2 (June 2017): 345-355.

Paul D. Kenny, “’The Enemy of the People’: Populists and Press Freedom,” Comparative Politics 73, no. 2 (January 2019): 1-15.

Howard F. Stein, “The Indispensable Enemy and the American-Soviet Relations,” Ethos 17, no. 4 (December 1989): 480-481.

Gabriella Lazaridis and Vasiliki Tsagkroni, “Posing for Legitimacy? Identity and Praxis of Far-right Populism in Greece,” in The Rise of the Far-Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and ‘Othering’, eds. Gabriella Lazaridis, Giovanni Campani and Annie Benveniste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 219.

Giovanna Campani, “Neo-fascism from the Twentieth Century to the Third Millennium: The Case of Italy,” in The Rise of the Far-Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and Othering’, eds. Gabriella Lazaridis, Giovanni Campani and Annie Benveniste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 28.

Ruth Breeze, “Positioning ‘the People’ and Its Enemies: Populism and Nationalism in AfD and UKIP,” Javnost - The Public 26, no. 1 (November 2018): 95. Breeze, “Positioning,” 97.

Annie Benveniste and Etienne Pingaud, “Far-right Movements in France: The Principal Role of Front National and the Rise of Islamophobia,” in The Rise of the Far-Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and ‘Othering’, eds. Gabriella Lazaridis, Giovanni Campani and Annie Benveniste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 64.

Birte Siim and Susi Meret, “Right-wing Populism in Denmark: People, Nation and Welfare in the Construction of the ‘Other,’” in The Rise of the Far-Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and ‘Othering’, eds. Gabriella Lazaridis, Giovanni Campani and Annie Benveniste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 123.

Mojca Pajnik, Roman Kuhar and Iztok Sori, “Populism in the Slovenian Context: Between Ethno-nationalism and Re-traditionalisation,” in The Rise of the Far-Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and ‘Othering’, eds. Gabriella Lazaridis, Giovanni Campani and Annie Benveniste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 139.

Pajnik, Kuhar and Sori, “Populism in the Slovenian Context,” 155. Olga Baysha, “Dehumanizing Political Others: A Discursive-material Perspective,” Critical Discourse Studies 17, no. 3 (January 2019), 9.

Petya Kabakchieva, “Is There a Soil for National-populism in This Country? (Има ли почва националпопулизмът у нас?),” Objectif 157, (2008): 3–4. As cited in Anna Krasteva, “The Post-communist Rise of National Populism: Bulgarian Paradoxes,” in The Rise of the Far-Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and ‘Othering’, eds. Gabriella Lazaridis, Giovanni Campani and Annie Benveniste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 184. Mudde, Populist Radical Right, 77.

Am Johal, “The Post-Democratic Horizon: Friend and Enemy in the Age of New Authoritarianism,” in Spectres of Fascism: Historical, Theoretical and International Perspectives, ed. Samir Gandesha (London: Pluto Press, 2020), 97.

Hilda Fernandez-Alvarez, “So, You Want a Master? Psychoanalytic Considerations on the Intellectual’s Responsibility in Light of Traumatic Repetition,” in Spectres of Fascism: Historical, Theoretical and International Perspectives, ed. Samir Gandesha (London: Pluto Press, 2020).

Richard Feldstein, Political Correctness: A Response from the Cultural Left (London: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), 15.

Robert G Weiner, Robert Moses Peaslee and Duncan Prettyman, “It’s All About the Villain!” in The Supervillain Reader, eds. Robert Moses Peaslee and Robert G. Weiner (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2020).

Stephen Graham Jones, “Building a Better Bad Guy,” in The Supervillain Reader, eds. Robert Moses Peaslee and Robert G. Weiner (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2020).

Lennart Soberon, “Vivisecting the Villain,” in The Supervillain Reader, eds. Robert Moses Peaslee and Robert G. Weiner (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2020), 71.

Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (New York: Verso, 2001).

Ranghild Fiebig-von Hase and Ursula Lehmkuhl, Enemy Images in American History (Berghahn Books, 1997), 37 as cited in Soberon, “Vivisecting the Villain,” 71.

Global News, YouTube video, February 25th, 2022, accessed on April 21, 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTw3hWa3E8M&ab_channel=GlobalNews. Moffitt and Torney, “Rethinking Populism,” 384.

Ritchie Savage, Populist Discourse in Venezuela and the United States: American Unexceptionalism and Political Identity Formation (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), 134.

Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political (London: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 26, 29.

Sarah Wildman, “Marine Le Pen wants to protect France’s LGBT community – but opposes same-sex marriage,” Vox, May 5, 2017.

Ernesto Laclau, “Populism: What’s in a Name?,” in Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. Francesco Panizza, (New York. London: Verso, 2005).

Studia-politica-1-2022-97-121-cover

Downloads

Published

2025-06-07

How to Cite

A Theoretical Overview of the Creation of the Inimical Other in Contemporary Populist Discourse. (2025). Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review , 12(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.62229/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.