Current Achievements in Geosite Research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5719/aub-g/71.1/7

Keywords:

geosite, geomorphosite, scientific importance, conservation, preservation

Abstract

One of the many ways of study by which geography can be useful in today's economic context is by analyzing those geographic locations that are important not only scientifically but also culturally, historically, aesthetically or economically. Called in the literature "a bridge between science and culture" (Reynard et al., 2018), geosites are the subject of recent but increasingly complex concerns within geosciences. Amid growing awareness of the importance of the human-environment relationship both for individuals and for society as a whole, the study of geography in recent decades has manifested a predisposition to focus on increasingly practical applications, and the scope of geographic research has broaden to actions that have in the forefront the highlighting of natural heritage, natural monuments and the need to preserve, protect and enhance the environment.

References

Alexandrowicz, W., Alexandrowicz, Z. (2022). Geosites in Tourist Areas: the Best Method for the Promotion of Geotourism and Geoheritage (an Example from the Polish Flysch Carpathians). Geoheritage. 14. 10.1007/s12371-022- 00655-2;

Barbălată (Alb), L., Comănescu, L. (2021). Environmental Sustainability and the Inclusion of Geomorphosites in Tourist Activity - Case Study: The Baiului Mountains, Romania. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148094;

Bouzekraoui, H., Barakat, A., El Youssi, M., Touhami, F., Mouaddine, A., Hafid, A., Zwoliński, Z. (2019). Mapping geosites as gateways to the geotourism management in Central High-Atlas (Morocco). Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0007;

Brancucci, G., Maniglio Calcagno A.E., Mazzino, F. (2002). The Geosites' role and the landscape European convention, at Geomorphological Sites: research, assessment and improvement - Workshop Proceedings, Modena (Italy), 19-22 June 2002 Edited by P. CORATZA and M. MARCHETTI © 2002 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia;

Brilha, J. (2015). Geoconservation, History of. 10.1007/978-3-642-40871-7_3-1;

Brilha, J. (2016). Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review. Geoheritage. 8. 119-134. 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3;

Bruschi, V.M., Cendrero, A. (2005). Geosite evaluation: can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario, 18(1), 293-306;

Cocean, G., Cocean, P. (2016). An Assessment of Gorges for Purposes of Identifying Geomorphosites of Geotourism Value in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Geoheritage. 9. 10.1007/s12371-016-0180-5;

Comănescu, L., Nedelea, A. (2017). Geomorphosites Assessments of the Glacial and Periglacial Landforms from Southern Carpathians. 10.1007/978-3-319-32589- 7_10;

Comănescu, L., Nedelea, A., Dobre, R. (2011). Evaluation of geomorphosites in Vistea Valley (Fagaras Mountains-Carpathians, Romania). International journal of physical sciences. 6. 1161-1168;

Comănescu L., Nedelea A., Dobre R. (2012). The evaluation of geomorphosites from the Ponoare protected area, Forum geografic. Studii şi cercetări de geografie şi protecţie a mediului;

Comănescu, L., Nedelea, A., Dobre, R. (2013). The geotouristic map between theory and practical use. Case study - The central sector of the Bucegi Mountains (Romania). 11. 16-23;

Comănescu, L., Nedelea, A., Stănoiu, G. (2017). Geomorphosites and Geotourism in Bucharest City Center (Romania). Quaestiones Geographicae. 36. 10.1515/quageo-2017-0029;

Coratza, P., Giusti, C. (2005). Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario. 18. 307-313;

Dumitras, D.G., Grigore, D., Perșa, D., Abioui, M. (2019). Geosite of the Month 'Canaralele din Portul Hârșova'-The paleontological importance of the most complete Oxfordian geosite in Central Dobrogea, Romania. Geoconservation Research. 2. 40-44. 10.30486/gcr.2019.1878598.1014;

Fernandes, Gonçalo & Tracana, Rosa & Castro, Emanuel & Fernandes, Magda. (2021). Geoeducation and Tourism in Estrela UNESCO Global Geopark (Portugal) and Its Contributions to the Construction of a Sustainable Destination. 10.1007/978-3-030-69193-6_7;

Forello, M., Giannelli, A., Giaccio, V., Palmieri, N., Mastronardi, N. (2017). Geosites and parks for the sustainable development of inner areas: the Matese mountain (Italy), GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year X, no. 2, vol. 20, November 2017, p.231-242;

Fuertes-Gutiérrez, I., Fernández-Martínez, E. (2010). Geosites inventory in the Leon Province (Northwestern Spain): A tool to introduce geoheritage into regional environmental management. Geoheritage 2010, 2, 57–75;

Golfinopoulos, Vasilis & Papadopoulou, Penelope & Koumoutsou, Eleni & Zouros, Nickolas & Fassoulas, Charalampos & Zelilidis, Avraam & Iliopoulos, George. (2022). Quantitative Assessment of the Geosites of Chelmos-Vouraikos UNESCO Global Geopark (Greece). Geosciences. 12. 63. 10.3390/geosciences12020063;

Grecu, F. (2016). Hazarde şi riscuri naturale, Editura Universitară, Bucureşti;

Grecu, F. (2017). Interconditionality geomorphosites and natural hazards, Riscuri şi catastrofe, nr. Xvi, vol. 20, nr. 1/2017;

Grecu, F., Iosif, D. (2014a). La notion du Géosite et son pertinence dans une étude sur la région des Gorges du Danube en Roumanie, Analele Universităţii Bucureşti: Seria Geografie LXIII, p178-184;

Grecu, F., Iosif, D. (2014b). The geosites from Danube Defile in Romania. The vulnerability to touristic activities. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites. 14. 178-184;

Henriques, M. (2015). Geosites, Management of. 10.1007/978-3-642-40871-7_8-1;

Ielenicz, M., Comănescu, L., Nedelea, A. (2013). Lexicon de geomorfologie, Editura Universitară, Bucureşti;

Khoshraftar, R. (2013). Geoparks:Research and Pedagogical Values;

Kubalíková, L., Kirchner, K., Bajer, A. (2021). Geomorphological Resources for Geoeducation and Geotourism. 10.1007/978-981-15-4956-4_18;

Lima, F.F., Brilha, J., Salamuni, E. (2010). Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: A methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage 2010, 2, 91–99;

Macovei, M., Danciu, I., Sebe-Rădoi, O.G., Grigore, D., Crușoveanu, S. (2020). Preliminary evaluation of the Abator Quarry - Hârșova (Romania) - A proposal for a new geosite. Muzeul Olteniei, Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. Tom. 36, No. 1/2020, pag. 21-28, ISSN 1454-6914;

Martinez-Graña, A. & Legoinha, P., Goy, J.L., González-Delgado, J., Armenteros, I., Dabrio, C., Zazo, C. (2021). Geological-Geomorphological and Paleontological Heritage in the Algarve (Portugal) Applied to Geotourism and Geoeducation. Land. 10. 918. 10.3390/land10090918;

Maxwell, P., Joselli. (2021). Places for geoeducation and geocommunication in a touristic cluster and their contributions to geoconservation in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: preliminary assessment;

Milu, V. (2021). Preliminary Assessment of the Geological and Mining Heritage of the Golden Quadrilateral (Metaliferi Mountains, Romania) as a Potential Geotourism Destination. Sustainability. 13. 10114. 10.3390/su131810114;

Necula, N., Mihai, N., Vasiliniuc, I. (2022). Geosites, geomorphosites and geodiversity in Putna Catchment, Vrancea, Romania. 10.5194/egusphere-egu22-11182;

Niţă, A. F. (2018). Assessment and mapping of geomorphosites in Topliţa resort, Romania, for geotourism development. 10.5593/sgem2018/5.2/S20.014;

Panizza, M., Piacente, S. (2002). Geomorphosites: A bridge between scientific research, cultural integration and artistic suggestion. Geomorphological sites: Research, assessment and improvement, Workshop proceedings. 15-20;

Pereira, P., Reynard, E., Coratza, P., Cayla, N., Clivaz M., Comănescu, L., Darbellay L., Giusti C., Grecu, F., Hobléa, F. (2019). Intergeo platforma digital para o ensino de patrimonio geomorfologico, in vol Geoconservacao no contexto do antropoceno desafios e oportunidades, CEGOT-Universidade do Minho,ISBN 978-989-54317-5-5, p.395;

ProGEO. (2011). Conserving our shared geoheritage a protocol on geoconservation pronciples, sustainable site use, management, fieldworks, fossil and mineral collecting. […]. 10pp. http://www.progeo.se/progeo-protocol-definitions-2011915.pdf;

Rădulescu, C., Grecu, F. (2018a). General and particular in the inventory and assessment of geosites in southern Dobrudja, Romania, Analele Universităţii Bucureşti, Geographie, LXVII, p. 42 – 63 BDI;

Rădulescu, C., Grecu, F. (2018a). L'enquête statistique sur la relation entre valeur scientifique et la valeur globale des géosites du Plateau d'Oltina, Cinq Continents Volume 8, Numéro 18, 2018, p. 118-132;

Reynard E. (2005a). Géomorphosites et paysage, Géomorphologie. Relief, processus, environnement, 3/2005, 181-188;

Reynard, E. (2006). Fiche d'inventaire des géomorphosites, Université de Lausanne, Institut de géographie, rapport non publié, 8 pages;

Reynard, E. (2009). Geomorphosites: Definitions and characteristics. Geomorphosites. 9-20;

Reynard, E., Coratza, P. (2013). Scientific research on geomorphosites. A review of the activities of the IAG working group on geomorphosites over the last twelve years. (IT ISSN 0391-9838, 2013) DOI 10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36.13;

Reynard, E., Coratza, P., Cayla N., Clivaz, M., Comănescu, L., Darbellay, L., Giusti C., Grecu, F., Hobléa, F., Pereira, P. (2018). INTERGEO: A digital

platform for university education on geomorphological heritage, Geoheritage, https://doi.org 10.1007/s12371-018-0298-8, p.1-13;

Reynard, E., Kaiser, C., Martin, S., Regolini, G. (2015) An application for Geosciences communication by smartphones and tablets. In: Lollino G et al. (eds) Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, Volume 8. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 265–268. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_46;

Selmi, L., Canesin, T., Gauci, R., Pereira, P., Coratza, P. (2022). Degradation Risk Assessment: Understanding the Impacts of Climate Change on Geoheritage. Sustainability. 14. 4262. 10.3390/su14074262;

Toma, C., Seghedi, A., Popa, R.G. (2022). Salt is the Seed of Life: a Geotourism Potential Analysis of Salt Areas in Buzău Land, Romania. Geoheritage. 14. 10.1007/s12371-021-00639-8;

Tufănoiu, I., Simion, A., Maruntelu, A., Teriș, B., Grecu, A. (2020). The geomorphosites assessment for determinating the geotourism potential. Case study on the natural park Putna-Vrancea Romania. 10.18509/GBP.2020.56;

Zafeiropoulos, G., Drinia, H., Antonarakou, A., Zouros, N. (2021). From Geoheritage to Geoeducation, Geoethics and Geotourism: A Critical Evaluation of the Greek Region. Geosciences. 11. 381. 10.3390/geosciences11090381.

aub-geography-2022-Vol71-07-cover

Downloads

Published

2025-05-25

How to Cite

Current Achievements in Geosite Research. (2025). Annals of the University of Bucharest. Geography Series, 71(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.5719/aub-g/71.1/7

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)