THE JUDGING ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL DANCE SPORT CHAMPIONSHIP, 2019

Abstract

From the desire to write a work paper entitled "The Judging Priorities in DANCE SPORTS", I have studied the National Championship judging from this perspective and I consider I have identified some tendencies. there  were clubs and athletes who deliberately chose not to participate in this championship because they predicted what would happen.
Causes.Only one man is the one who determines the attributions and which referees have to judge each age and section category, depending on his interests. This allows the compilation of lists of referees in which are created majorities that entail the competition of objective results. Only one man was the holder of the full list of referees invited in 2019. Measures.The list of referees invited to the National Championship must be officially presented to all members of the federation at least two months before the competition, so that everyone can organize their informed training. This will give equal chances.
Conclusions.Normally, all schools of thought should have been represented equally in the team of the referees to ensure objectivity. Unfortunately, the school of thought that prioritizes the technical criterion was represented in the juries by 75% and the results, in our opinion, were not objective.