O A DOUA CRITICĂ A RAȚIUNII TEORETICE? CONCEPTUL CUNOAȘTERII ÎN TRACTATUS

Authors

  • MIRCEA FLONTA Academia Română Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62229/rrfaxiv-1/1

Keywords:

propoziții sintetice a posteriori, propoziții ale ştiinței naturii, cerințe interne versus cerințe externe ale cunoaşterii lumii

Abstract

Is there a relationship between the goals pursued and presented in the Critique of Pure Reason and in Tractatus logico-philosophicus? This text argues that such a relationship will be ascertained if we will compare Kant’s answer to the question “How are synthetic a priori judgments possible?” with the Tractarian answer to the question “How are propositions of natural science possible?”. Based on this comparison, the Tractatus may be deemed to be a “new critique of theoretical reason”. As in the case of the critique of theoretical reason undertaken by Kant, the object of Tractarian investigation is constituted by ascertaining internal requirements for possessing knowledge of the world.

Author Biography

  • MIRCEA FLONTA, Academia Română

    Prof. univ. dr. Mircea Flonta este membru al Academiei Romȃne şi profesor emerit al Universității din București.

RRFAXIV-1-1

Published

2024-02-29